As a server, Xserve has a dedicated support team that knows the hardware inside out, and is much easier to use than a Linux alternative.
The reason why this debate exists is that we believe that in all the markets, Macs are more capable than PCs. You have to pay a very high premium for the stylish looks and ease-of-use of a Mac.
Comparable PCs can be bought much cheaper, a natural consequence of there being so many different suppliers all competing for market share. Which means you get more for your money by buying a PC.
The fact that the PC-component market is crowded is only good for consumers, as it increases competition and drives prices down. This cannot be good for consumers; monopolies never are. Let the Mac users wail in denail. I will hold on to my PC until the end of Microsoft. People pay for looks and style. This is an undeniable fact. Why else do we have catwalks and fashion houses?
Mac computers are more expensive, but that is because they are better computers in terms of style and ease of use. A Skoda costs less than a Mercedes that does the same job, but if you gave people the option, more people would choose the Merc any day. The argument that the premium is excessively high is also a non-starter. Furthermore, is the fact that there are many PC and PC component suppliers a good thing? It is easier to get a greater range of spare parts for a PC than a Mac.
For Macs, you often only have one choice at one price like a command economy , for PCs, there is a greater range of choices and a range of prices and qualities. Mac OS X is not optimized, this is a misconception spread by Apple, they use the same Kext based drivers as linux, which are less reliable than the Shell based drivers of Windows.
This is a common misperception about Macs. Macs use the same hard drives that go into PCs, which means you can easily buy any SATA hard drive from the same sites you order your PC hard drive and replace the one that comes by default with your Mac.
And we have to take in mind, that indeed they are pieces of hardware as Ram, videocards, ans other which are no Mac compatible. Mac users think that they are better than anyone else. They are also full of themselves and think they are cooler than the rest. Such an attitude can lead to anti-social behavior. It can also lead to Mac users losing their friends as people will tend to ignore them. This debate was started by a mac user.
Every debate of this kind is started by a mac user. This is a complete generalisation. Every debate of this kind is started by a Mac user. That is in no way true. Some Mac users do like to think that their computers are better than most other Windows or Linux computers on the market.
Something interesting to think about is that if every debate made in this way was started by a Mac user, how many PC users even want to stand up?
How many truly think that they are able to back up their points if every debate of this kind is started by a Mac user? It is a well established fact that no Mac gan go a year or two without experiencing some kind of a hardware defect. With the old machines iBook, Powerbook, etc , it was usually the hard-drives and logic boards that drove users crazy. But with the advent of the new Intel based machines, problems have started popping up everywhere.
Macbooks have faced random shutdowns which almost led to a class action lawsuit against Apple , discoloration, chipping, display dimming and other such problems. The life expectancy of Mac hardware is still horribly low. And since its almost impossible to replace many critical and defective parts within Macs, a defect can cause you to throw away your machine unless, as mentioned above, you had the oversight to purchase applecare well in advance.
This is not a problem with Apple, this is a problem with all laptops, which contain hard drives that were not created to be portable. While flash drives will make this problem a thing of the past, Mac users who buy real computers like Mac Pros, experience a level of satisfaction unprecedented in the computer industry. Mac Pro users have been known to have earlier models like G3 PowerMacs for up to 10 years after buying them and can easily sell their machines when they get ready to upgrade because Macs have the highest resale values in the industry.
When choosing a PC, the options are endless. With the huge variety of brand names and styles, its possible to find a PC in just about any colour, size, weight, and design. Macs provide fewer options when selecting a particular style. Both the Macbook and Macbook Air are The Macbook, although claimed to be portable, is not designed to be lightweight and is rather heavy at 5lbs. Much lighter, ultraportable laptops for PC can be found within the same price range or less.
Also, we must remember that all OEM company pre-built i. Just like the generic and prescription medications, the generic ones are cheaper and lower quality. The build quality is the exact same; the only difference is the Apple charges you 2x the cost. The build quality of macintosh laptops is much stronger than that of the average laptop. Macs can be customized with RAM and hard drive space, just as any other laptop.
The ability to right click is also vital for playing video games and general ease of use. Macs have always had the ability to right click. Macs were always capable of using any HID compliant mouse. The right click on those third party mice would work exactly like the right click on a comparable Windows machine. It makes things a lot easier of course, but you can live without it because Our Holy Lord Steve Jobs decided it was cheaper.
The right click then works by tapping two fingers simultaneously on the touchpad. Indeed, if Macs DID become more popular and sold more, we could be assured that their current exclusivity and cult status would disappear accordingly.
Yes could not hold reference to the current Windows 7 operating system. The higher quality of Macs has nothing to do with their exclusivity. In contrast, you can run Leopard with all the bells and whistles on a MHz Powerbook running 1. The operating system starts up faster, runs faster, and gets the same tasks done with less hassle, all with less hardware. To argue the point about PCs currently being more popular than Macs in the current market, the share of the Mac has grown quickly year-over-year, while the market share of the Windows operating system has dropped quickly, and a slowdown in the growth of that operating system is evident.
More and more are turning to Macs, and that is fact. Why does apple do this? As someone who works with Macs and PCs, this argument does not stand up. As regards the argument that Macs break down after the warranty period is over, this is also false. I use, and other people also use, Macs that have had no need of repairs or even memory upgrades for seven years.
Try using a seven year old PC now. Apple is a business like any other — the tactic of releasing a new product soon after another is not unique. The two machines running the same Linux distribution are even more difficult to tell apart.
More and more third party developers make both Windows and Mac versions of their software and most storage media can handle both. This very fact that Microsoft and Apple now work so closely together and release such similar products, to me, severely diminishes another distinguishing factor between the two — the corporate image. Apple are no longer the quirky independent producers rooting for the underdog. First at all, we have to clarify Microsoft, Windows and Office terms. Microsoft is a enterprise, they create Windows, an operating system, Office, a office suite, and other software.
Microsoft sell software, so they are not going to lost Mac users pontencial consumers. For that reason they create Office for Mac, and Internet Explorer, etc. Apple sell software, too. And they are not going to lost PC users potencial consumers. For that reason they create Quicktime and iTunes for Windows. Indeed, Microsoft was accused of obstruct the third party developer to create software for their Windows operating system.
And, at the end, a court condemned Microsoft. Finally, Mac and PC have differents architectures in design and software. As We have said before, Mac have a optimized, synchronized and harmonizaed software-hardware combination, and Mac OSX is building in a modular way. In the linux hand, a Mac with Linux is not a Mac, Mac is a computer designed by Apple with a operating system designed by Apple, that the Mac magic.
An Intel Mac does not run off of the same base as an Intel Windows computer. Linux is a different story. Windows runs off of the MS-DOS base, a base criticized for its lack of built-in security and inefficient development. Macs instead run off of UNIX, a stable, secure operating system base that runs in an entirely different way. PCs and Macs do have the same x86 architecture, but that is for CPUs, not operating systems, which I believe is the point being brought up.
With the same amount of money, I can buy a much more powerful pc with lots of brand to choose from. Mac are just the best thing you can have this start from the design and the quality of it. I am a media student and all along i have been using mac and their have got good graphics and fast as well. The only reason Macs keep gaining market shares is because people believe they look cool with their snow white apple laptops at a coffee shop.
Is that really a problem? Is there really a problem that Macs are gaining market share for this reason? A great way for people to want to buy something is because of friends. ColorSync is a nifty tool, but professionals do not need that nonsense and does not help one who is colorblind. The bottleneck of 3D rendering keeps Mac from being a design engineers choice of computer.
Rendering a type style as well as a Mac is only needed by professionals, in which, should be using the appropriate software which does not require this render transfer. It is true more software IS compatible with windows, Windows holds a larger popularity. Window PCs generally come equipped ready to be plugged into a TV. Gaming is obviously a win for PCs due to their ability for higher gaming performance and compatiblity.
Mac may be able to run Windows, but while running windows one would find it rather useless to run Mac OS. As stated before, Windows come in all sorts of choices and are available cheaper for lower end computers.
The site claims for Apple to be more advanced with applications and tools for photo, video and music editing, however, as a recording musician that went to college for graphic design, i must say that Windows is up to par with Mac in the sense of having their own programs capable of delivering the same outcome.
Reliability and Security are currently better on Mac, however, like i said, Security is and will continue to slip more and more as more people buy into Mac. And Finally, the stability of the computer is most dependent on how good your computer is.
Like earlier stated, PCs have low end computer, Macs do not. All the Yes points: Macs are more intuitive and user-friendly Macs are more secure Macs are hassle-free Macs are for professionals Macs continue to gain Market share in all sectors Macs are beautiful Macs can now do Windows and gaming Macs can right click Mac users are way cool!!
No because…. Yes because…. Notify of. With the Mac, the issue rests more often just with Apple. Of course, any customer of PowerMax who has ever had a question or problem can attest to the friendly expertise we also provide to help sort it all out for them as well. Apple makes upgrading its OS simple, Microsoft still keeps it complicated. Apple smoothly transitions its customers to its latest OS for free. The best we can say about that is that their scattered approach to naming matches their scattered approach to their OS.
Microsoft is for people who love tinkering with computers, Apple is for people who just want to get their work done. Those kind of people like Windows on the front end as well because they understand all the crazy intricacies and complications of the computer system.
They just look cool. You can run Windows on a Mac anyway, so why not get the best of both worlds? So why not both save money in the long run and have access to virtually any desktop software you want? Macs are actually cheaper in the long run Sure, you can buy a Windows PC for fewer up-front dollars. It can easily last a whole working day without recharging. That means you don't have to worry if you forgot to bring your charger. The average battery life is 12 hours, but it depends on how extensively you use your MacBook.
The design is also not to be overlooked. Let's be fair, looks do matter. The minimalist design and the clean lines with rounded corners show that Apple likes to keep it simple. And it works. The MacBook feels sturdy and reliable despite the thin design. Another advantage is the light weight. This means I can easily take it with me without having to carry a heavy bag. Are you still undecided between a MacBook and a Windows laptop? The MacBook as well as Windows laptops have fans and haters.
This makes it more difficult to make a choice. Because who should you believe? It mostly depends on your personal preferences and what you want to use the laptop for. If you're already used to Apple's ecosystem, the MacBook is a good option. Do you mainly want to use the laptop for gaming? A Windows laptop is probably more suitable for you. The MacBook isn't as suitable for hardcore gamers. It's also less suitable if you want to have full control. Windows is simply easier to adjust to your liking.
Do you want to enjoy the user-friendliness of Apple, but do you have a fixed work space? Your safest bet is probably a Mac desktop.
This computer gives you all the benefits of macOS and won't look out of place on your desk either.
0コメント