One psychological perspective characterizes the locus of control construct as a continuum of powerlessness. Those with an internal locus of control believe they control the outcomes of their experiences, while those with an external locus of control believe that their lives are governed by external forces like luck or fate. American researchers Barry Goodstadt and Larry Hjelle conducted an experiment on forty university students to investigate the relationship between locus of control and power.
Satisfactory performance was defined as maintaining the production level of the workers at or above a specified standard. Goodstadt and Hjelle found that the university students with an external locus of control were less likely than those with an internal locus of control to rely on personal persuasion tactics and significantly more likely to use coercive power i. Great Man Theory. Is power, or how power is used, what makes someone a great leader? Does it matter if we train leaders to use the appropriate base of power for a given circumstance?
According to the Great Man Theory, great leaders are born, not made. This theory states that people in positions of power deserve to lead because of the characteristics they were born with. Read through this article to decide whether you agree with the Great Man Theory, and how the bases of social power would influence leadership under the theory.
Coercive Power. Theory, meet practice TDL is an applied research consultancy. History In , American social psychologists John French and Bertram Raven conducted a study on social power, which they defined as the potential for social influence.
Four of the five bases of power defined by French and Raven include: Reward power: The ability to issue rewards for compliance a type of formal power. Referent power: Trust or respect afforded to an influencing agent, typically based on their general disposition and behaviors a type of personal power. Consequences After coercion was defined by French and Raven to be a base of social power, it has been studied in the context of social dynamics and communication, including organizational management, 6 persuasion tactics, 7 and intimate relationships.
Controversies Certainly, there are disadvantages to using coercive power. Giving power to the powerless French and Raven explored bases of social power, 2 but what happens when you give power to someone who was previously powerless?
Sources Powerful. The bases of social power. Classics of Organization Theory , 7 , Raven, B. Psychology Prof. Emeritus John R. French Jr. Michigan News: University of Michigan. Bertram H. Raven UCLA: Psychology. The advantages of coercive power in the workplace. Houston Chronicle. Motivated compliance with bases of social power. Engage them in a shared vision.
You might also like Step forward and move on Managing Upwards. Whose truth? Leaders - The things you shouldn't know How to Diffuse an Argument — a lesson in the knife drawer.
Telephone: General Enquiries: enquiries impellus. Head office Impellus Ltd. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves. This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access. Berkowitz, L. CrossRef Google Scholar. Burnett, J. XVI, May , — Google Scholar.
Elliott, C. Hewgill, M. Higbee, K. Janis, I. Berkowitz Ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology , Vol. Kotier, P. Lazer, R. Leventhal, H.
0コメント